Print Send to friend Archive Comment

What's in a name?

Is tradition more important than identity?

Amid all the hoo-ha over their recent wedding comes reports that Ashlee Simpson is set to take Pete Wentz's surname. Pretty soon, she'll be known professionally as Ashlee Simpson-Wentz, and legally, she'll be plain old Ashlee Wentz. The news certainly took us by surprise - for a young, fairly non-traditional couple, adopting her husband's surname is an old-fashioned move for Ashlee.

Yesterday, she told reporters that taking your husband's surname is, "Something that a woman should do when they're marrying a man. It's a tradition that I think is a great tradition."

Similiarly, when Eva Longoria married Spurs star Tony Parker last year, she became Eva Longoria Parker. This isn't the first time Eva's taken her husband's surname, either - when she was married to General Hospital star, Tyler Christopher, she was known as Eva Longoria Christopher. Eva says, "I love the tradition of changing the name."

Here at Cosmo, we're divided on the issue. While some of us feel that marriage is a traditional act and changing one's name is part of that partnership, others believe that the institution is old-fashioned, sexist and symbolises ownership. What do you guys think?
Number of Comments(15) Add Comment
Posted 29 May 2008 by opinion
I changed my last name and I love being called Mrs'''' and I love being a married woman, I don't understand this crap about only half taking your husbands surname. Either your there or your not: Eva Longoria Parker - why not just Eva Parker!!!  Report thisReport this

Posted 29 May 2008 by Katrina Elizabeth
I feel that to take on your husbands name can be a beautiful addition to cementing your lives together. My husband and I have done this and also decided to carry my middle name, which happens to be the same as my mothers, down through our family with our daughter. A man's surname carries on through the generations and we felt this is a nice way for some part of my name to be carried on through the generations as well. It makes for a nice compromise and doesn't leave anyone out.  Report thisReport this

Posted 29 May 2008 by Nicole
I'm only 20years of age and grew up knowing women can do anything and having a man certainly does not complete one's life. Having said that, when it comes time for me to marry I'll be definitely following in the tradition of taking on my husband's surname. Why else get married? Especially these days when de-facto partnerships are well recognised and can even be registered.  Report thisReport this

Posted 29 May 2008 by Simone
I think its tradition that should always be when it comes to marriage. I agree that changing to your husband's surname is, in part, showing your husband your lifetime commitment. These celebrities seem too scared to let go of their surname for fear of losing their identity and fame. Their faces don't change, everyone knows who they are regardless of their surnames, the only difference is they'll also be known for is the fact that they're married.  Report thisReport this

Posted 29 May 2008 by Danika
If I was to get married I would take my husbands name. Especially since I have to spell my last name out canstantly, I'd like something a little easier. I think having the same last name is that final step into being family.  Report thisReport this

PREVIOUS PAGE123 NEXT

Poll

How much would you be comfortable spending to be a bridesmaid at a friend's wedding?




Competitions

Cosmo CompetitionsEnter now for your opportunity to WIN one of Cosmopolitan's competitions! more »

Most popular

It Girls 2008 more »
Men and Sex more »
You're fired! more »
The diva wears Prada more »